Human Resource & Labor News
www.agc.orgApril 3, 2014 / Issue No. 2-14
AGC Home Page
Email our Editor
Search Back Issues
Forward to a Friend
Subscribe
Printer Friendly
On the Inside
Equal Employment Opportunity
Court Upholds OFCCPs New Disabilities Rule
EEOC Issues New Guidance on Religious Garb and Grooming in the Workplace
Wage & Benefits
President Issues Executive Order Raising Federal Contractor Minimum Wage
IRS Final Rule Partially Delays ACA Employer Shared Responsibility Requirement
AGC Partners with Willis North America to Launch New Private Insurance Exchange
Department of Labor Offers Upcoming Prevailing Wage Seminars
Changes to Overtime Regulations Expected
Immigration
Videos Demonstrate How to Complete Form I-9
Union Contracting
Union Not Entitled to Breach of Contract Damages Against Contractor that Assigned Work Consistent with NLRB Order but not Arbitration Award
HR Education
2014 Construction HR and Training Professionals Conference Set for Oct. 15-17 in Phoenix, Ariz.
Equal Employment Opportunity
Court Upholds OFCCPs New Disabilities Rule
 

Revised regulations addressing affirmative action obligations of federal contractors in the employment of individuals with disabilities (IWDs) took effect on March 24 as scheduled, following a failed legal challenge by the Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC).  On March 21, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia denied ABC’s request to enjoin the new rule, rejecting each of the associations many arguments. 

The rule, issued by the U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) imposes three major requirements:  (1) a data collection mandate extending pre-existing obligations to invite new employees to self-identify as an IWD to job applicants; (2) a data analysis mandate related to the number of applicants and new hires who so self-identify, the number of job openings, job applicants, and jobs filled; and (3) a 7% utilization goal for the employment of IWDs.  Due in part to considerable efforts by The Associated General Contractors of America (AGC) to educate OFCCP and advocate for contractors’ interests, the final rule is significantly less burdensome than the rule originally proposed by the agency. 

ABC’s arguments fell under three primary claims.  First, ABC claimed that OFCCP exceeded its statutory authority under Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act in promulgating the rule.  The court disagreed, finding that both the text and legislative history of the Rehabilitation Act permit OFCCP’s actions.  The court also rejected ABC’s argument that the data collection mandate violates the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Second, ABC claimed that the rule is arbitrary and capricious.  The court reviewed the justifications OFCCP espoused for each of the three requirements in the rule.  It found that the agency provided a rational basis for each requirement.  This includes a sufficient justification for refusing to exempt the construction industry, as requested by AGC, ABC, and others during the rulemaking process.  “The fact that a certain disability might prevent someone from taking a certain job in the construction industry does not mean that the industry is significantly less suited to employing individuals with disabilities,” said the court.

Third, ABC claimed that the rule violates the Regulatory Flexibility Act.  That statute requires agencies to analyze the impact of their regulations on small businesses.  The court held that the OFCCP’s certification that the rule will not impose a significant economic burden was reasonable.  In particular, the court found reasonable the OFCCP’s assumption that construction contractors would not need to create costly new systems to comply with the new rule because they are already subject to parallel requirements under regulations for the employment of women and minorities. 

AGC was invited to join in the lawsuit but declined based on an assessment of the likelihood of success and a decision to focus resources on working with OFCCP to ensure fair enforcement of the rule and to prevent burdensome revisions to other regulations under review.  In furtherance of such goals, AGC met with OFCCP Director Pat Shiu and her staff on March 27 to discuss the agency’s plans for revising the regulations related to the employment of women and minorities and how AGC might be able to help the agency understand the application of those regulations in the construction industry.  As previously reported, the latest Semiannual Regulatory Agenda showed an April 2014 estimated date for publication of a proposed rule.  However, Director Shiu stated during the March 27 meeting that the proposed rule is not ready and that a new estimated publication date will be listed in the next regulatory agenda.

It is unknown at this time whether ABC plans to appeal the decision.  AGC will monitor the case and report on significant developments.

Associated Bldrs. & Contractors, Inc. v. Shiu, Case No. 13-1806 (D. DC, 3/21/14).
Return to Top

2300 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 400 • Arlington, VA 22201 • 703.548.3118 (phone) • 703.548.3119 (fax) • www.agc.org
AGC Home | About AGC | Advocacy | Industry Topics | Construction Markets | Programs & Events | Career Development | News & Media

To ensure delivery of AGC’s Human Resource & Labor News, please add 'communications@agc.org' to your email address book or Safe Sender List. If you are still having problems receiving our communications, visit our white-listing page for more details.

© Copyright The Associated General Contractors (AGC) of America. All Rights Reserved.


The Associated General Contractors of America | Quality People. Quality Projects.