BOMA | Building Owners and Managers Association of San Francisco
Advocate: An Update on Legislative, Regulatory, and Political Issues Affecting Commercial Real Estate
June 25, 2015
Volume 21, Issue 6
UPDATE: California Proposes New Elevator Maintenance Rules
Costs May Increase for Elevator Maintenance
Your feedback is requested

To represent our members' interests, BOMA San Francisco's Codes and Regulations Committee representatives had a rare opportunity to discuss the proposed elevator code changes with the California Department of Industrial Relations, Occupational Safety and Health Division, Elevator Unit (Cal/OSHA) chief, Dan Barker recently. The purpose of the gathering was to help the Department understand any negative impacts, e.g., cost, availability, safety issues, et cetera, that may result from these changes. 

Also, National Elevator Industry, Inc. (NEII) is making building owners aware of the efforts underway by the Cal/OSHA to develop theGroup V elevator codes.  Cal/OSHA has proposed over 60 pages of changes - more than 125 specific modifications - to the ASME A.17.1 (2013) /CSA B44-13 Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators.  

The draft amendments to the ASME Code under discussion are so significant and controversial that, if enacted through formal rule making, they will drastically alter current elevator designs for all of the major elevator companies and impose significant new costs and construction delays on California building owners.

Key areas of concern in Cal/OSHA's pre-rule making draft and initial estimates of potential costs are set forth below.

KEY AREAS OF CONCERN:
  • Prohibits certain machine-room-less (MRL) designs in California.
  • Adds new restrictions for other MRL designs.
  • Prohibits elevator controls from being located in the building hoistway, requiring control rooms to be constructed.
  • Significant cost increases and delays for new construction.
  • Significant cost increases for elevator maintenance on existing buildings.
  • No demonstrable safety benefit; in fact, creates new workplace safety issues.
  • Lack of empirical data to support changes.
  • Disproportionate impact on low to mid-rise buildings.
  • Stunts technological innovation and eco-efficient building designs.
  • Moves California building transportation backwards 20 years.
SIGNIFICANT NEW COSTS:
  • Elevators unique for California
    • $100K-$200K per elevator
  • Larger cars, larger hoistways, less space to rent
    • $25M annually
  • No Hydraulic machine room-less elevators
    • $25M annually
  • Control rooms must be outside of hoistway
    • $100M annually
  • Licensed mechanics required to perform new tasks
    • $33.6M annually
The draft proposed rules are currently under review internally at Cal/OSHA. Formal rule making has not commenced, but we expect the rule making package to be completed and ready to file by late summer. 
 
If you have any feedback, please send it to mhargrove@cbpa.com.
--------------------

UPDATE - May 29, 2014

BOMA San Francisco's Codes and Regulations Committee members reviewed a letter that the National Elevator Industry Association wrote to the head of the California Department of Industrial Relations. Click here for a presentation related to the missive and here for an attachment to the letter.

The communication states that the 60 pages of amendments that the Department is considering adopting would make California unique as having the strictest and most expensive elevator requirements in the country.

Please be aware of these proposed changes for elevator maintenance if they are permanently adopted. 

If you have any feedback, please send it to mhargrove@cbpa.com

--------------------

UPDATE - April 28, 2014

Since 2012, members of BOMA San Francisco's Codes and Regulations Committee have been working with BOMA California and the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health on changes to statewide elevator maintenance rules.  Our members' feedback was detailed in a BOMA amended 2012 Division Circular Letter.

On April 22, 2014, the Division held a meeting to review a draft of new elevator regulations regarding:

  • Elevator maintenance;
  • The qualifications for elevator inspectors and/or mechanics;
  • And, requirements for other conveyances.

BOMA California members continue to maintain their feelings that routine upkeep of elevators - specifically those that do not affect the safe operation of the system - may eventually require Division mandated oversight by a certified elevator mechanic.  Any proposed changes along those lines would increase the time and cost for the maintenance of elevators and add a modicum of value to the safety of the elevator system.

BOMA San Francisco Board Member Kevin FitzPatirck kindly attended the April 22, 2014 meeting for BOMA members and relayed their comments.

If you have any questions or feedback regarding the draft proposal of new elevator regulations, please contact kenc@boma.com.

-------------------

Original Post - October 12, 2012

Elevator Categories of Work Circular Letter Withdrawn

BOMA California representatives are pleased to report that the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health has given notice that it has formally withdrawn Circular Letter 11-01 in its entirety, effective immediately.   Prior to this retraction, BOMA San Francisco's Codes and Regulations Committee members suggested edits to the Circular Letter which was sent to the Division on May 12, 2012.

According to the Division, the Circular Letter was initially published because they had received inquiries regarding if certain work on conveyances were covered by state law. After receiving more information from the elevator industry the Division has decided that clarifications are more appropriately addressed through a formal rule making process. BOMA California members agree and applaud the Division for this decision.  BOMA thanks our colleagues in the elevator industry for their diligence.

There will be future efforts by the Division regarding rule making so this issue is likely to be revisited by year end.

 
Previous Article  Previous Article Next Article  Next Article
Share this article: Twitter Facebook LinkedIn

In This Issue
BOMA Protects the Commercial Real Estate Industry - Proposition 13/Split Roll Property Tax
•  California Senate Constitutional Amendment 5
BOMA San Francisco Members Meet with San Francisco Supervisor David Campos
•  Topics Included Prop. M Development Limits and Legacy Business Registry in San Francisco
BOMA San Francisco's Drought Coverage
•  San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Orders Mandatory Water Reduction on July 1, 2015
Port of San Francisco Waterfront Plan Working Group and Advisory Teams
•  BOMA Member Participation is Requested by July 17, 2015
BOMA SF-PAC Slate Card for the November 3, 2015 San Francisco Municipal Election
•  Elect These Leaders for San Francisco This November
BOMA International's Political Action Committee (BOMAPAC) Needs Your Support
•  Jim Collins with Shorenstein is leading the effort for BOMA San Francisco
BOMA California Energy Update - Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
•  EV-Ready Building Standards Set to Take Effect on July 1, 2015
UPDATE: California Proposes New Elevator Maintenance Rules
•  Costs May Increase for Elevator Maintenance
California Commercial Real Estate Summit
•  BOMA San Francisco Members Advocate for Prop. 13 and More
San Francisco's Economic Barometer
•  Quarterly Update
San Francisco Permit Cost Calculating Schedule
•  From the San Francisco Department of Building Inspection
U.S. Department of Energy Crowdsourcing Initiative
•  Seeks Buildings-Related Problems to Solve
ABOUT SHORENSTEIN REALTY SERVICES, L.P.

 


 

National Real Estate Investor

Shorenstein is one of the country’s oldest and most respected real estate organizations active nationally in the ownership and operation of high-quality office properties. Due to its success over many years and multiple real estate cycles, Shorenstein has established its reputation as a creative and knowledgeable investor. The company is privately owned and is headquartered in San Francisco.  Currently, Shorenstein owns and manages a portfolio exceeding 23 million square feet.

Providing Real Property Services

Shorenstein provides asset management, leasing, property management and construction services to the properties in its portfolio through its wholly-owned property services affiliate, Shorenstein Realty Services.

Seamless Integration of Capabilities

The close coordination between the investment, asset management and operating professionals within Shorenstein is the key to Shorenstein’s ability to deliver exceptional services to its tenants and exceptional value to its clients and partners. With extensive internal resources and a commitment to excellence, Shorenstein has an unsurpassed ability to address operating issues and to capitalize on investment opportunities.

Please click here to learn more about Shorenstien Realty Services, L.P.

SPONSORED BY

ADVOCACY EVENTS
•  Energy and Environment Committee Meeting
July 7, 2015
Ferry Building, Port Commission Hearing Room
Please click here for more information.
•  Government Affairs Policy Advisory Committee (GAPAC) Meeting
July 8, 2015
235 Montgomery Street (Russ Building), 7th Floor 
Please click here for more information.
• 
Codes and Regulations Committee 
July 22, 2015
201 California Street, 2nd Floor Conference Room 
Please click here for more information.
• 
Emergency Preparedness Committee Meeting
August 11, 2015
Location 225 Bush Street, Montgomery Burns Boardroom
Please click here for more information.
RESOURCES
Print-Friendly Version
Search Back Issues
Forward this Issue
Email the Editor
BOMA SF Home Page
BOMA SF Advocacy Page
BOMA SF Blog
BOMA California
BOMA International
© BOMA San Francisco. All Rights Reserved.
233 Sansome Street, 8th Floor  |  San Francisco, CA 94104
Advertise in BOMA SanFrancisco Advocate

Advocacy  |  Education & Training  |  Networking
Membership  |  BOMASF Govít Affairs & Industry News Blog  |  Home

To ensure delivery, please add 'johnb@boma.com' to your email address book or Safe Sender List.
If you are still having problems receiving our communications, see our white-listing page for more details.