July, 2007





Engineering and Surveying Workforce Development Forum and Student Outreach Campaign Kick-off
Land Use Measure Would Impede Infrastructure Development
California Has the Worst Urban Congestion in the Nation
USC Keston Institute Releases Study on Public Private Partnerships
Local Surveying Firm Responds to MacArthur Maze Collapse
CELSOC Awards Program: Engineering Excellence, Professional Development, Chapter of the Year
Educational and Professional Development Program
In Memory of Jasper Cooper, Registered Civil Engineer
CELSOC Membership Growing Strong

Contact the Editor
CELSOC Home Page
Shop Online
Take ACTION!

Robert Salaber
President
Salaber Associates, Inc.
Phone: 707-693-8800

William L. Green
President-Elect
RBF Consulting
Phone: 909-676-8042

Thomas W. Blackburn
Vice President
Blackburn Consulting
Phone: 530-887-1494

Jerry Michael
Secretary-Treasurer
RRM Design Group
Phone: 805-543-1794

Richard L. Pool
Immediate Past President
Associated Transportation Engineers
Phone: 805-682-8503

Jane Rozga
ACEC National Director
CH2M Hill
Phone: 707-568-5300

Click here for Board of Directors

Click here for CELSOC Staff

Land Use Measure Would Impede Infrastructure Development

When voters approved the infrastructure bonds last fall, they endorsed the need to rebuild California. These same voters now demand and deserve major, rapid transportation improvements.

Unfortunately, a measure has been introduced in the Legislature that would require regional transportation plans to include, and transportation funding decisions to be based on, preferred growth scenarios which dramatically restrict local growth. SB 375 (Steinberg) transfers local land use decisions to regional planning agencies, fundamentally altering the local planning process and inserting state control over California's local communities.

Implementation of this measure would seriously compromise established criteria for funding transportation projects through the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) by enacting new, restrictive criteria for project funding eligibility.

California is struggling with a housing imbalance and lack of infrastructure to support the current and future population of our growing state. Placing additional restrictions and limitations on growth in our local communities artificially drives up the cost of housing and limits the personal choices of California citizens.

SB 375 impedes new residential, commercial, and retail development, and the jobs and transportation improvements that go with it.

For More Information about the E-Update, please contact Rebecca Nicholas at rnicholas@celsoc.org.