05/27/2005

 
 
HRMA and the Business Journal Welcome Bob Nelson to Milwaukee
Best Selling Author Shares Motivation Strategies
President's Corner
Jane Navis Reflects Upon a Year of Change
Membership Committee
HRMA Activities Continue Throughout Summer
Legislative Updates
Supreme Court Rules Disparate Impact Theory Applicable to ADEA Claims
Diversity Calendar
Diversity Events in June
HRMA News
New HRMA Members
Upcoming June and July Events
Understand the Hispanic Workforce to Increase Productivity
HRMA Golf Outing: Update & Attire
Thank You, 2004-2005 Board Members
Items of Interest
Record Growth Seen in Outsourcing of HR Functions
Poll: Healthcare Costs More Worrisome Than Losing Job, Terrorist Attack
Workplace Violence is on the Upswing, Say HR Leaders
Weingarten Rights Clarified, for Now
Competing While Still Employed Breaches Duty of Loyalty
Poll Results
Tuition Assistance Benefits Poll
 
HRMA Home Page
HRMA Programs
Contact Us
Search Back Issues
Forward to a Friend
Print This Article
Print Full Newsletter
Subscription Management
Subscribe with RSS!

Supreme Court Rules Disparate Impact Theory Applicable to ADEA Claims
by Robert K. Sholl, Reinhart, Boerner, Van Deuren, S.C.

The United States Supreme Court recently held that the disparate impact theory of recovery, which generally refers to claims for "unintentional discrimination," applies to cases brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA").  The holding represents a departure from the previous approach of the majority of jurisdictions, which generally held that disparate impact claims are only available for claims of race, gender, national origin or religious discrimination under Title VII.  While the holding exposes employers to increased litigation under th ADEA, the scope of the exposure appears to be narrow.

For more information, download pdf here.

 

[Return to top]

Unsubscribe