![]() |
|||||
Special 2021 Election Issue - Maine Medicine Weekly![]() Print-Friendly Article
|
![]() |
MMA member & Maine State Representative, Patty Hymanson, MD (York) *The views expressed are the opinions of Dr. Hymanson. The Maine Medical Association does not have a formal position on Question 1. Please vote regardless. Of the three questions on the November 2nd ballot, the second is the least controversial so we will begin there. Transportation bonds come up each two-year cycle and pass easily. This year $85 million is for highways and $15 million for rail, aviation, ports and active transportation. Money from federal pandemic relief and matching programs will more than double this. Over 10 years, approximately $27 million will also be paid in interest through state revenue sources. Bonding is not a great way to pay for these costs but increased gas tax, mileage fee, fuel-efficiency or electric vehicle off-sets have not gained traction to replace it. Question 1 is a complex citizens’ referendum to stop the CMP power corridor linking HydroQuebec and Massachusetts through Maine. The Portland Press Herald has a comprehensive article I would suggest you read. You can find the article on my Facebook page along with a good dialogue in the comments from concerned Mainers and legislators. I learned a lot from them. The ads from the “no” camp have been maddeningly deceptive but I support hydropower to lessen fossil fuel use. What I learned is that Vermont has a plan, wants the project so it will likely be built there if Maine rejects it as NH did. Also, Hydro-Quebec has not guaranteed that more hydropower will be produced for this project so it may be a redistribution of existing hydropower. It is hard to trust CMP as the builder and maintainer of this transmission project. The benefits to Maine come in different forms but are not seen by many as enough. Others disagree. Question 3 asks us to expand our Maine Constitution to include “All individuals have a natural, inherent and unalienable right to food…” While one might agree with the intent, the wording is so vague that what it means might be decided case by case by a judge in court. There is no groundswell of support for this amendment and animal rights groups are actively against it while others are silent. Individual bills heard in the legislature might be a more focused way to protect private seed use as an example rather than the vague wording here that might be interpreted in the courts.
Here is a link to the referenda wording. Be sure to peruse the proposed laws themselves, not only the referenda questions, by clicking on the active links.
https://www.maine.gov/sos/cec/elec/upcoming/pdf/11-21citizensguide.pdf
Question 1 – Citizen
Initiative Question 2 – Bond Issue Question 3 – Constitutional Amendment
< Previous Article | Next Article > [ return to top ] |
|||
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
To
ensure delivery of Maine Medicine Weekly Update,
please add 'info@mainemed.com' to your email address book or Safe
Sender List.
If you are still having problems receiving our communications,
see our white-listing page for more details: http://www.commpartners.com/website/white-listing.htm
Unsubscribe here
For more information or to contact us directly, please visit www.mainemed.com | ©