September 22, 2017


In This Issue
Fast Facts
Senate Scraps Bipartisan Healthcare Fixes after Trump Administration Announces Opposition
Senate Vote Next Week on Graham-Cassidy Plan to Repeal/Replace Portions of the ACA is Uncertain following Opposition Announcements
NAHU Sends Labor Department’s ERISA Advisory Council Support Letter on Reducing the Burden of Mandated Disclosures
Senate Finance Leaders Introduce CHIP-Reauthorization Bill
How Could Graham-Cassidy Lead to Single Payer? Listen to this Week’s Podcast to Find Out
Compliance Cornered: EAPs Pose Compliance Complications
Did You Miss Yesterday’s Compliance Corner Webinar on Understanding Medicare Interactions with Group Insurance? Watch It Now
Get Ready for Fall by Completing your Annual Marketplace Training
HUPAC Roundup
What We’re Reading
E-mail the Editor
Visit the NAHU Website
Printer Friendly Version
Compliance Cornered: EAPs Pose Compliance Complications

Head over to the Compliance Cornered blog to check out our latest post: “EAPs Pose Compliance Complications.” Employee assistance plans are popular employer-sponsored plans that help employees address personal and work-related problems that impact their health or job performance. Benefits provided by EAPs are varied in both scope and breadth. Benefits may include:

Mental health referral services

Mental health counseling

Financial counseling

Drug or alcohol abuse counseling

Assistance with addressing major life events.

The wide variety of EAPs allows employers to find a plan that is both affordable and of value to employees, but this variety also makes it difficult to determine the compliance requirements that surround an EAP. Sometimes, EAP services may even be included in life or disability packages.

To determine if an EAP is subject to ERISA, it depends on whether the plan provides medical care. If a plan provides medical care, it is subject to ERISA. The DOL has issued advisory opinions that an EAP with trained counselors who provide counseling services is providing medical care. Of note, the trained counselors do not have to be doctors or psychologists to meet this threshold.

A plan that only provides referrals to counselors may not be deemed to “provide medical care” and may, therefore, not be an ERISA plan. However, if the service providers that make the referrals are trained in a field related to the EAP’s services, this could mean that the plan would be deemed to provide medical benefits.

ERISA also applies only when a plan is “established or maintained” by an employer. If the employer doesn’t contribute to the cost of the EAP or otherwise endorse the EAP, it may not be considered as established or maintained by the employer.

If a determination is made that the plan is subject to ERISA, then the plan is subject to ERISA’s plan document, SPD requirements and other ERISA provisions. Of note, information provided by the EAP vendor may not be sufficient to meet ERISA requirements.

If the plan provides counseling, it would be considered a group health plan that is subject to COBRA. EAPs are generally offered to all employees, even those who may not participate in the employer-provided health plan. As such, an EAP subject to COBRA requires that the COBRA initial notice be provided to all EAP-eligible employees.

To determine the applicable COBRA premium, employers should determine the premium attributable to the healthcare-related benefits only. For example, the premium attributable to job counseling or financial counseling services would not be included in the COBRA premium.

Open enrollment presents yet another challenge. If an employee continues EAP coverage under this scenario and the employee was eligible for the group health plan but not enrolled, then an opportunity to elect the health plan would be required.

Employers may limit eligibility for the EAP to those employees who enroll in the group health plan to avoid this COBRA complication. However, limiting coverage to those participating in the group health plan poses ACA problems, as the next paragraphs illustrate. Alternatively, the EAP’s benefits may continue after what would be a qualifying event for 36 months. As a result, there would be no loss of EAP coverage and no COBRA trigger.

Affordable Care Act
EAPs posed particular problems after enactment of the ACA. The DOL and Treasury Department issued rules that EAPs would be considered “excepted benefits” and therefore exempt from the ACA.

An EAP is considered an excepted benefit if four requirements are met:

1. They must not provide significant benefits in the form of medical care. The amount, scope and duration of covered services will be considered in evaluating compliance with this requirement.

2. EAP benefits may not be coordinated with group health plan benefits.

     a. EAP participants may not be required to use or exhaust EAP benefits before they are eligible for group health plan benefits.

     b. Eligibility for EAP benefits may not be made dependent on participation in another group health plan.

3. No employee premiums or contributions can be required for participating in an EAP.

4. An EAP that is an excepted benefit may not impose cost-sharing requirements.

The final rule that includes these requirements is here.

Health Savings Accounts
Since EAPs often include coverage for services irrespective of the employer’s high-deductible health plan (HDHP), this raises the concern that an EAP could cause a person to lose eligibility to contribute to an HSA. The IRS has provided guidance that an EAP is not a health plan if it does not provide “significant benefits in the nature of medical care or treatment.”IRS Notice 2004-33 Q&A number 10 addresses this concern.

As with many compliance issues in employee benefits, the facts and circumstances are critical to assessing compliance, and the “right” answer may not be clear or apparent. 

< Previous Article | Next Article >
NAHU on Twitter NAHU on Facebook NAHU on LinkedIn