Learning to use verb tenses appropriately is reportedly a major
challenge in the process of ESL/EFL acquisition. Larsen-Freeman and
Celce-Murcia (2015) strongly recommend that instructors focus on clear
explanations of the various principles that govern English tenses and
aspects. To this effect, grammatical explanations of tense rules are
regularly featured in ESL/EFL pedagogical materials.
We work with advanced level students in Canadian universities.
The curriculum proposes classes that entail a thorough or partial review
of verb tenses and their appropriate uses to support text analysis and
academic writing. A number of students, however, are not prepared for
such a review, nor is there always time to consolidate what, presumably,
has been covered in their English training prior to admittance into
higher level ESL classes. Our classes also gather an increasing number
of recent immigrants with large differences in ESL/EFL backgrounds who have a strong need to acquire English
proficiency to pursue university degrees or secure employment.
Added to these challenges is that available time in most teaching
contexts for grammar is generally limited (Ellis, 2006), and instructors
must decide upon suitable strategies within curriculum constraints.
Given this situation and in an attempt to ease our students’ learning
process, we began researching comprehensible shortcuts to the many verb
tense rules our students need to contend with. We present one of these,
which focuses on time (or adverbial) clause identification within a
relevant time frame (past, present, or future). (For the sake of
simplicity, we consider the following as “tenses”: future simple,
progressive, perfect, and perfect progressive. We acknowledge that not
all grammarians agree that these are tenses.)
Time clauses, as we know, are a common hallmark of English
sentences. The grammar materials used in the institutions where we teach
usually have at least one section dedicated to their identification,
especially when future time is discussed, given that time clauses
describing a future time frame necessarily (and, to many students,
unexpectedly) call for present tenses. For example:
- I’ll do it tomorrow, when I
finish school (NOT: when I will
finish).
- I’m going to watch TV as soon as I
have finished / [as soon
as I finish] my homework (NOT: as soon as I will have
finished).
- John is planning to have a party while his parents are visiting
relatives (NOT: while his parents will be
visiting).
(Thewlis, 1993, p. 270)
We cover the topic of time clauses at the beginning of a verb
tense review. This allows us to introduce the shortcut suggestion
described here. We begin the review by explaining the nature of clauses.
Simply put, one verb implies one clause; two verbs, two clauses; and so
on. We teach students to distinguish between a main (independent)
clause and a dependent clause. The former can stand on its own; the
latter cannot. In so doing, we provide and elicit a variety of examples.
We further explain that independent clauses can be joined by a
coordinating conjunction (FANBOYS: for, and, nor, but, or,
yet, so). For example: The cat is grey and the dog is black. Finally, we
explain that though there are different types of dependent clauses, our
goal is to focus on the time clause, most often introduced by the
following words/expressions: when, while, before, after, as
soon as, until, by the time, since, whenever, as.
We review the examples and ask students to identify which
dependent clauses are time clauses, an exercise they seldom find
difficult to do. By this time, we have also reviewed stative verbs in
contrast to action verbs (to be versus to
walk). Recognizing English stative (or stative-meaning)
verbs is relevant because these often call for nonprogressive tenses.
Furthermore, knowledge of stative verbs based on native language cannot
be relied upon given that these vary across languages. We conclude our
lesson with a shortcut suggestion.
In sentences containing (dependent) time clauses, identify the
time frame in the (independent) main clause. Does it describe the past
(or something that began in the past), the present, or the future? Once
established, a time clause tense can be chosen based on the shortcut
shown in Table 1.
Table 1: Shortcut to Time Clause Tense Choice
Main Clause Time Frame |
Tense in Time Clause |
while/as + action verb* |
Other time clauses |
Past |
past progressive |
simple past |
Present |
present progressive |
simple present |
Future |
present progressive |
simple present |
*If a stative-meaning verb, proceed according to third column:
Jade is staying home while she has (is having) the flu.
In short, students feeling overwhelmed by the tense-aspect
system understanding can make a number of reliable and somewhat
straightforward choices. We further encourage them to pay attention to
time clause identification (and stative/action verb identification)
throughout the class. Among other things, we suggest that they
systematically underline the words/expressions introducing time clauses
in all examined exercises and written texts and pay attention to the
verb tenses used.
We devised this shortcut as a result of analyzing the many
sentences found in the tense practice exercises of more than ten
international intermediate/advanced grammar ESL textbooks. Initially, we
did this to be able to quickly direct students to featured tense rules
so that they may understand the rationale behind any of the answers
provided in class or through answer keys. Over time, we began to see a
pattern for time clauses emerge, with one main exception, which we point
out in class. A time clause featuring since may
require a perfect tense:
- I’ve known her since we
were at school together [we no longer
are].
- I’ve known her since I’ve
lived on this street [and still live
there].
(Swan, 2005, p. 513)
Experience with students over 3 years has generally confirmed
that using this shortcut allows for appropriate tense choices in time
clauses and greater focus on main clause tense uses, which generally
reflect core rules. To see a more comprehensive list of examples
demonstrating shortcut validity, one may consult the online grid
describing various time clause patterns presented by Bergen Community
College (Egan, 2020).
We inform students that this shortcut does
not reflect all the possibilities for tense uses in time
clauses (see the following examples), and we analyze the tenses in any
such examples throughout the class. Students are further encouraged to
experiment with the use of other tenses than those suggested in the
shortcut. They are given a list we have drawn of salient examples and
explanations to this effect that also demonstrate that the shortcut
options essentially remain possible [provided in brackets where
applicable/with relevant time frame identification]. Following are the
main excerpts from this list:
(a) We usually use while to say that two
longer actions or situations go/went on at the same time. We can use
progressive or simple tenses:
- While you were
reading the paper, I was working. [Past]
- John cooked supper while I watched
TV. [was watching/Past]
(Swan, 2005, p. 68)
(b) We can use as, when, or
while to introduce a longer “background” action or situation,
usually with a progressive tense. But as and while can be used with a simple tense, especially
with a “stative” verb like sit, lie, or grow:
- As I
sat reading the paper, the door
burst open. [was sitting/Past time
frame] (Swan, 2005, p. 68)
(c) As is used (with simple tenses) to
talk about two situations which develop or change together:
- As I
get older[,] I
get more optimistic. [am getting (suggestion: become in main
clause)/Present] (Swan, 2005, p. 68).
(d) After, before, as soon as, until, and when clauses can be used with perfect tenses to
show that one thing is completed before another begins:
- I’ll telephone you after I’ve
seen Jake. [I see/Future]
(Swan, 2005, p. 28)
- He went out before [as soon as] I had finished my sentence. [finished/Past] (Swan, 2005, p.
84)
- I waited until the rain had stopped. [stopped/Past](Swan,
2005, p. 594)
- I will borrow her book when she has
finished it. [finishes/Future].
(e) In time clauses with when, a statement
that implies a what question concerning the future
can be followed by the simple future:
- Joachim must decide/doesn’t know
(what?) when he will return home. [returns/Future]
(f) Finally, there are particular uses of perfect tenses that need to be examined in context:
- While Daniko had been
travelling, Jacques had tended the garden. [Past]
As language instructors, we definitely encourage the wealth of
possibilities offered by the English language. Classroom experience,
preliminary testing, and student comments have nevertheless demonstrated
that the time clause identification shortcut has proven useful,
especially to students struggling with verb tense choices. Not only do
verb tense use mistakes in time clauses diminish and seemingly become
less prevalent in speech, but students can place greater focus on main
clause tense use understanding, which is where verb tense rules are more
obviously featured. We have also used this shortcut with high school
ESL students successfully, though our experience mainly lies with
adults. Ultimately, this shortcut provides an option to facilitate verb
tense use consolidation, namely in the context of institutions where
testing prevails as a measure of ESL progress and fluency.
References
Egan, D. (2020). Guide for mixed tense exercises—Part
2: Time clauses. https://bergen.edu/ELRC/guidemxtnsex.html
Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An
SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly 40, 83–107.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Celce-Murcia, M. (2015). The grammar book: Form, meaning and use for English language
teachers (3rd ed.). Heinle and Heinle.
Swan, M. (2005). Practical English usage (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Thewlis, S. (1993). Grammar dimensions three—Form,
meaning, and use (D. Larsen-Freeman, Ed.). Heinle &
Heinle.
Danièle Allard, PhD, works both at Université de
Sherbrooke, in the Faculty of Education, and Bishop’s University, in
Continuing Education. She has taught second language courses for more
than 20 years.
Riichiro Mizoguchi, PhD, is professor emeritus at the
Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology. His research
interests include knowledge-based systems, ontological engineering, and
intelligent learning support systems. |