[NOTE: This article has been reviewed by the SRIS leaders, and not copyedited by TESOL, due to its length.]
In "Tales from the Dark Side," one of my chapters in Color, Race and English Language Teaching (Curtis
& Romney, 2006, pp. 11-22), I note that darkness is usually
associated with badness, whereas lightness is generally associated with
goodness. There are many reasons for these associations, going back to
at least Biblical times. For example, more than 100 light/dark
references can be found in the Bible, and in almost all of them Dark is
Bad, Light is Good. For example: “For you are all
children of light, children of the day. We are not of the night or of
the darkness” (1 Thessalonians 5:5). Millennia later, the same
color-coded connotations are still with us, for example, in the Star Wars movie franchise, which is one of the
largest and most profitable in the world. As one of the infamously evil
characters, Sheev Palpatine, says: “The dark
side of the Force is a pathway to many abilities some consider to be
unnatural”. The power of the Affective
Factor can also been seen here in the world of Star Wars, for
example: “Individuals
who used the dark side drew their power from darker emotions such as
fear, anger, hatred, and aggression”. So, when a close,
Canadian friend of mine (who is also a member of our SRIS) said to me
recently, and I should add, playfully: “Oh, so you’ve gone to the dark
side, eh?” I had to stop and think.
My SRIS friend was referring to the fact that, since recently
rotating off the TESOL International Association’s Board of Directors,
off the Association’s Executive Committee, and out of the presidential
line after three years, I have been doing some consulting work for one
of the largest financial services firms in North America. (It may be
important to note that they are not a bank.) They approached me to help
them develop their Diversity and Inclusion (D&I) programs in the
USA and Canada. I agreed to work with them, partly as I made my three
years back on the Board (2014-2017) a 20-hour a week, 50 weeks a year
service leadership commitment. As a result, I did almost no paid work
during those three years, but the main reason for working with this
financial services firm is that I have been a client of theirs for more
than 12 years. I came to be a client because, in the early 2000s, we
went to all of the major banks where we live (Kingston, Ontario, Canada)
and asked them about ‘Socially Responsible Investing’. The banks’
responses ranged from blank stares to polite smiles that spoke volumes,
which sounded very much like: “Oh, you new immigrants, you’re welcome to
Canada, of course, but you have so much to learn
about how we do things here, and this ‘Socially Responsible Investing’
of which you speak is nothing to do with us”.
On the other hand, this particular financial services firm
said: “You know what, we’ve heard of that [Socially Responsible
Investing] and we don’t know much about it, but we’ll look into it, and
get back to you”, which they did, after which I became a client of
theirs. Lastly, I should add that this particular firm appears to be
very much aligned with Peter Senge’s notion of a ‘learning
organization’, which he defined as: “…organizations where people
continually expand their capacity to create the results they truly
desire, where new and expansive patterns of thinking are nurtured, where
collective aspiration is set free, and where people are continually
learning to see the whole together” (1990, p. 3). Here, then, is a brief
summary of some of the lessons that are emerging as this D&I
project unfolds.
Differentness Vs Diversity
For a number of reasons, talking about diversity can be
difficult. For example, when Brown, Smith and Jones or BSJ (a pseudonym)
were looking for a consultant to help them develop their D&I
programs, and my name was put forward, the question came up: How diverse
is he? That may be an important question, but one that is difficult to
answer because there are so many different kinds of diversity – from
race, skin color, gender, age, and ethnicity, to sexual orientation,
medical conditions, and diversity of (dis)abilities – any number of
which can be embodied within the same individual. However, if the
discussion can be framed in terms of differentness, then it is possible
to address the unique individuality of the experience. Someone can be
asked: Where you live and/or where you work, do the people around you
look similar to each other but different from you? Do you believe that
the people around you – at work, where you live, etc. – react and
respond to you based on your apparent differentness from them/the
majority?
Visible Vs Invisible Differentness
The limitation of these kinds of differentness questions is
that they are based on being visibly different, on
being a ‘visible minority’. Therefore, although differentness factors,
such as race, color, gender, age, and ethnicity are often visible from
afar – which we are calling ‘Differentness at a Distance’ or
‘Long-Distance Diversity’ – sexual orientation, for example, usually
cannot be seen from far away. Then there are differentness factors such
as medical conditions and diversity of (dis)abilities, that may or may
not be visible, depending on whether the symptoms of a medical condition
show, or on whether the person’s disability is more to do with
physiological constraints, or with mental health, or both. The issue of
visible vs. invisible differentness is important to BSJ as they are keen
to recruit more financial advisors from the LGBT(Q) community, but as
sexual orientation is not visible, and as employers are not usually
allowed to ask about that, recruiting such financial advisors is going
to be one of the challenges of including those who are less-visibly (or
even in-visibly) different.
‘Positive Self-Interest’
‘Positive Self-interest’ might sound like a contradiction in
terms, as ‘self interested’ is usually defined negatively, for example:
“Motivated
by one's personal interest or advantage, especially
without regard for others” (Oxford English
Dictionary, emphasis added) . However, in terms of “regard for others”,
BSJ is acutely aware that greater diversity, of all kinds, in their
workforce has many potential benefits, including a better ‘bottom line’,
more innovation, and better decision-making, as well as the idea that
‘It’s the right thing to do’. In my experience, it is not enough to tell
employers – that includes some of the schools, colleges and
universities that I have worked with – that their workforces should be
more diverse because ‘It’s the right thing to do’. In that case, a
number of those employers nod thoughtfully, then appear to forget all
about D&I, as soon as I leave the room. Out-of-sight,
out-of-mind. But BSJ is one of the largest and most successful financial
services firms in North America, and they realize that to stay at the
top, they must invest time, money and other resources
into building a more diverse workforce – to go beyond the rhetoric of
D&I, to the reality.
Unpacking the Language
One of the mantras of BSJ is “Words Matter”, which is a phrase
that I have seen on the powerpoint slides in many of the presentations
given by their financial advisors, written down in notes, put up on
noticeboards, etc. For some reason – probably my personal biases and
prejudices – I did not expect a financial services firm to be so acutely
aware of the power of language. When I am asked what I do, I often
reply: “I do language for a living”, as, by definition, language is the
basis of everything language teachers and learners do. I was then,
pleasantly surprised to have my view of this particular world, of
financial services, challenged. As a result of BSJ’s focus on language,
diversity and inclusion, we are spending time at BSJ looking closely and
carefully at what is meant and understood, within the organization, by
those terms, as well as related terms such as ‘minority’, ‘majority’,
and ‘under-represented’.
Making the Biological Case for D&I
As I have noted above, in my experience, arguing for
D&I on the basis that ‘It’s the right thing to do’ can have
little or no effect, beyond some level of raising awareness that this is
an area that an organization needs to address. As reflective
practitioners, we know that awareness is an important starting point,
but if that awareness does not translate into change – from changing
understanding to changing practices – then we cannot move beyond the
starting point. Therefore, as I also noted above, a degree of
self-interest, in terms of the bottom line – or whatever it is that is
motivating real change in terms of D&I – can be a positive
force. However, one of the things that I have added to the discussions
at BSJ (and elsewhere) is the idea that, biologically speaking, ‘Purity
is Death. Diversity is Life’.
Drawing on my years working in hospitals in the U.K, as a
Medical Science Officer, I am able to show that a 100% pure strain of
any living thing has what we used to call, in biomedical science, Zero
Environmental Adaptability. Consequently, even the smallest change in
the environment – a cough or a sneeze, or a change in the room
temperature, even of a small degree – results in death. The idea that
‘Purity is Death. Diversity is Life’ is not a political slogan, but a
Fact of Life, on every biological level – from the cell, to the organ,
to entire metabolic systems – has been the most powerful of all of the
D&I models, metaphors and analogies that I have presented. As I
noted at the beginning of this article, one of the Core Values of the
TESOL International Association is “Respect
for diversity”, but it is not only language teaching and
learning organizations that are committed to D&I. It is,
therefore, helpful to look further afield, to see what other kinds of
organizations are doing to help create more diverse and inclusive
workplaces and communities of practice.
Concluding Comments
To expand on the opening
discussion of light and dark, not only may dark-skinned people suffer as
a result of such Biblical color-coding, but black-and-white may also be
a false dichotomy, like labeling people as being ‘good’ or ‘bad’. An
essential aspect of helping to create more diverse and inclusive
communities is recognizing our own biases and prejudices, as those do
not make us ‘bad people’, just ‘people’, so denying those aspects of
ourselves only makes matters worse. I am, therefore, grateful to BSJ for
this opportunity to expand my view of their world, and to realize that,
although the Big Banks certainly play a central role in the problems of
socioeconomic inequity globally, there are some financial institutions
that are committed to ideals similar to those of us in our TESOL world.
Within that world, we may sometimes forget that that there may be many
organizations that are not not-for-profit educational institutions, but
which may nonetheless be working to make the world a better place,
through their own D&I programs and initiatives.
References
Curtis, A. & Romney. M. (Eds.). (2006). Color,
race and English language teaching: Shades of meaning.
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Senge, P.M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and
practice of the learning organization. New York, NY:
Doubleday.
Andy Curtis received his M.A. in Applied
Linguistics, and his Ph.D. in International Education, from the
University of York, England. From 2015 to 2016, Andy served as the 50th
President of the TESOL International Association. He is based in
Ontario, Canada, from where he works as a consultant for learning
organizations worldwide. |